5 Ways to Optimize Application Sourcing Costs in an AI-Enabled Market
Application sourcing —software, support, labor and managed services — presents a prime opportunity to reduce spend and improve value realization.
Advisory
Benchmarking Services
You can’t manage what you don’t measure.
The Industry’s Deepest Benchmark Database and Strongest Methodology
We have +15 years' experience helping enterprise clients compare defined services to the market.
We have the data and know-how to help you benchmark cost, quality and productivity across all functional areas of business and IT, including:
- IT Infrastructure Services
- Application Services
- Software/Hardware
- Telecom/Network
- Cloud (IaaS)
- Digital
- F&A, Procurement, & HR
Find out the right benchmarking services for your needs and strategic objectives.
Click on what you want to benchmark to learn more:
Price
Staffing rates, contract pricing and competitiveness
Cost
Total cost of ownership (TCO) and industry benchmarks
Performance
SLAs, user experience and provider relationships
Contract
Price, terms and conditions
ISG Benchmarks Address Your Questions
Staffing
Are total staffing levels and staffing utilization right for each functional area?
Service Delivery
How do our level of assets compare? Are we providing the right service levels to users?
Spend
Are we spending the right amount of money in total, and by major functional area?
Leading Practices
Where are the variances from leading practices?
Performance Gaps
Why and where are there gaps? How do we drive sustainable improvement?
Meaningful Savings
What are the high impact, high ROI changes we can make in the immediate term?
Service Source
Are there services currently provided in-house that should be outsourced, or vice versa?
Intelligent Simplification
What complexity or constraints could be alleviated through automation or simplification?
Price Benchmarking
Outsourcing contracts become uncompetitive over time, but it’s difficult to know when it will happen – or by how much.
Whether you want to benchmark your outsourcing contracts’ price, compare your internal service delivery cost to the market or both, ISG gives you at-a-glance visibility into price competitiveness via a single-pane dashboard, plus access to deep dives into real-time IT industry market price intelligence.
- Rate Card Assessments: Assesses labor rates found in time and material (T&M) agreements.
- Market Assessment: Assesses pricing found in outsourcing contracts, typically at the tower level.
- Contract Benchmark: Benchmarks pricing, performance and quality found in outsourcing contracts at a detailed level.
- Tripartite Contract Benchmark: Formal benchmark executed by both parties to a contract (client and provider), often as part of the benchmarking clause in master services agreement (MSA).
In addition to the above project based price benchmarking services, you can also monitor the price competitiveness of your contracts in real time using using the ISG Probenchmark® price monitoring service.
Acting on timely, accurate and actionable price data allows enterprises to more quickly respond to changes in market prices and make more strategic decisions regarding their IT services.
Cost Benchmarking
To get a complete picture of your landscape, you need to understand your service quality and personnel productivity, potential efficiencies and gaps, user satisfaction, and how all these elements relate to cost and compare to the market.
We offer a holistic benchmarking solution that gives real-time, online dashboard visibility into the three key components of performance:
- Understanding where your costs and performance stand today
- Establishing goals to resolve opportunities
- Tracking progress on achieving optimization
By comparing your spend, staffing allocations and performance across the enterprise, we help you identify opportunities to improve your financial and operational performance.
TCO Benchmark: Compares your total cost of ownership against industry standards of cost, quality and productivity for a variety of IT products and services.
Industry Benchmark: Compares costs against industry metrics, such as IT spend as a percent of revenue.
Get real-time access to cost benchmarking data with ISG Inform™.
Contract Benchmarking
Build a defense against the risks of fixed-price long-term contracts. Compare your contract price, terms and conditions to the market and know when your contract falls out of favor.
The terms and conditions of your contracts set guidelines of acceptable behavior, but they are evolving entities – and you need to manage that evolution. A commitment to benchmarking your contracts is a commitment to progress and improvement.
An ISG contract terms and conditions assessment can:
- Increase savings by reducing contract cycle times
- Decrease risk by helping you rely on audit trails and accurate benchmarking data
- Leverage baseline data and peer and industry performance comparisons to improve contract lifecycle management
- Establish goals for cost reduction, enter new markets and enhance supplier relationships
- Define new contracts with the latest trends in terms and conditions.
Performance Benchmarking
KPIs and SLAs are essential for tracking performance in terms of achieving strategic goals and making decisions. In the best of cases, KPIs can serve as an early warning system to let you know when you are heading off course and where
action might be needed.
An ISG performance benchmark compares your performance against industry peers and leaders and gives you a cost-effective approach to share, compare, improve, and transform internal functions and processes.
SLA Benchmark
assesses service levels against the market, including both performance levels and structure
User Experience Benchmark
measures the impact of technology on users, including customer satisfaction
The market has moved from ambition to accountability.
AI investment is accelerating, but results remain uneven. Only one in four initiatives is meeting revenue impact expectations, at an average spend of $1.3M per use case. Enterprises are no longer asking whether AI works. They are being asked to prove that it pays.
What We Deliver
AI strategy, governance and intelligence, built for execution.
Autonomous Enterprise
Operations built for autonomous execution, not retrofitted for it.
We help you identify where AI agents deliver the most value, restructure workflows around them and build the accountability models that keep autonomous execution auditable. The enterprises that win won't be the ones that reacted. They'll be the ones that designed for it first.
Autonomy-Level Pricing
Pricing that reflects how AI-enabled services are actually delivered.
We give enterprises transparent, benchmarkable pricing models that tag each resource unit with the autonomy level used to deliver it. As AI capability advances, your pricing keeps pace. Both buyers and providers can quantify what that progress is worth.
AI & Software Intelligence
Build-versus-buy decisions grounded in what AI is actually delivering.
We bring analysis of more than $2.6 billion in tracked AI spend to every sourcing decision. Procurement, technology and finance leaders get the independent intelligence to rationalize vendor portfolios and hold providers accountable to measurable outcomes.
AI Governance
Governance that accelerates AI adoption rather than constraining it.
We embed controls at the point of data creation, define accountability for autonomous actions and build adaptive frameworks that keep pace with AI without impeding it. Enterprises that get this right don't just manage risk. They build the trust that lets them scale faster.
AI Strategy
AI investment aligned to where impact is most achievable.
We ground strategy in research across 2,400 enterprise use cases, aligning investment to where impact is proven and designing the data, talent and governance foundations that move AI from pilots into the workflows that drive commercial results.
AI Maturity Index
A clear view of where you stand and a roadmap to where AI starts delivering.
We benchmark your AI readiness against peers across 75 countries, identify the dimensions holding you back and give you a personalized roadmap to close the gap.
The market today
Enterprise AI has moved out of IT and into the revenue line.
AI investment is shifting decisively toward revenue-generating functions. CRM automation, sales enablement and forecasting have replaced chatbots and IT productivity tools as the leading use case priorities, reflecting enterprise recognition that productivity gains alone do not satisfy board-level scrutiny. At the same time, use cases in production have doubled since 2024, and the portfolio is diversifying rapidly, with over 300 distinct function and industry-specific use cases now in active deployment.
ISG research across 2,400 enterprise use cases shows that the strongest AI returns are currently concentrated in compliance, risk management and quality control, not in the growth and cost outcomes most enterprises originally set out to achieve
The gap between where enterprises are investing and where AI is actually delivering is the defining commercial tension of 2025. Organizations that close it by targeting functions with structured, revenue-attributable data and clear ROI measures will establish performance benchmarks that compress the window for competitors still cycling through pilots. The standard is being set now.
Where enterprises are feeling the pressure
-
Business outcomes are lagging AI ambitionEnterprises are scaling Al faster than they are realizing value from it. The number of use cases in production doubled between 2024 and 2025, yet only one in four initiatives is meeting revenue impact expectations, and broad cost savings remain elusive. At an average spend of $1.3M per use case, the ROI gap is sharpening board-level scrutiny and forcing a harder question: are we building Al for impact, or for activity?
-
Data infrastructure exposing deferred investmentAl does fail in isolation. It fails on the foundations beneath it. Most enterprises are running modern Al on architectures built for reporting and compliance. Generative and agentic Al demand real-time contextually rich, governed data at the point of use. Without it, pilots stall and value dissipate before it reaches the business.
-
The barrier to scale is organizational, not technicalOrganizational readiness as the bigger constraint on Al adoption, not talent or tooling. Workflows haven't been redesigned. Decision rights haven't shifted. Enterprises that treat Al as a pure technology deployment, without investing in the human side of adoption, consistently report underwhelming ROI.
-
Agentic AI is outpacing governanceAs Al moves from generating outputs to executing tasks autonomously, the governance gap widens. Agentic Systems introduce a new class of risk that static compliance frameworks were never designed to catch. Governing what Al does, not just what it produces, is now a business-critical requirement.
Featured Insights
Featured Event
Future Workplace Summit
Work is Being Redesigned: Trust, talent and leadership are the hard parts.
Register nowISG Research
ISG is a leader in proprietary research, advisory consulting and executive event services focused on market trends and disruptive technologies.
Get the insight and guidance you need to accelerate growth and create more value.
Learn More
Research
The Growing Strategic Importance of Sales and Operations Planning
The growing strategic importance of sales and operations planning (S&OP) reflects the confluence of two major trends evolving outside of enterprise operations. One is the ongoing disintegration of the post-World War 2 liberal trade environment that began in the early 2010s and has accelerated since. The second is the increasing sophistication and approachability of S&OP software. These applications are designed to align an enterprise’s sales and marketing objectives with its operating environment (including its production and distribution assets as well as its supplier ecosystem) while respecting financial constraints. The availability of more accurate and nuanced machine learning (ML)-based forecasting systems and the growing availability of agents that shorten planning and execution cycles will enable enterprises using software to better adapt to change, anticipate risks and evaluate trade-offs to determine the best course of action faster with greater intelligence.
Research
Beyond Commerce: Tech That Closes Revenue Gaps
There is a growing disconnect between what digital commerce platforms were originally built to do and what modern revenue teams now need them to deliver. Most traditional platforms were designed to manage storefronts, catalogs and transactions. They perform well when the goal is to display products, enforce static pricing and process payments. But in today’s revenue environment, the challenge is no longer limited to completing a transaction. It is about orchestrating revenue across multiple moments, touchpoints and decision makers over time. As organizations adopt recurring revenue models, usage-based pricing and faster deal cycles, commerce technology that cannot adapt to these realities becomes a constraint on growth rather than a driver of it.
Research
Autonomous Enterprise and AI-Powered Software Architecture
The mission to enable an autonomous enterprise, as I have articulated, remains aspirational for most organizations. Few have aligned business and technology leadership, strategy and execution to support autonomous operations at any scale. A shared definition is essential. An autonomous enterprise follows an operating model in which intelligent systems can sense conditions, decide actions, execute outcomes and continuously learn, that is orchestrated across the business, with humans setting intent, governance and accountability.
Research
Economic, demographic and technology shifts are rewriting the U.S. healthcare playbook
The U.S. healthcare environment is undergoing a structural shift as economic pressure, demographic change and technological acceleration reshape how payers, providers and life sciences organizations operate. With healthcare already representing 17 percent of the region’s GDP and advancing toward a 20 percent share by 2032, rising medical demand is paralleled by an unprecedented expansion in technology investment. Aging populations and the growing burden of chronic disease are increasing healthcare consumption, while intensifying cost pressures are heightening the urgency for new digital operating models that reduce friction and enable more sustainable delivery.
Research
Mid-tier and specialist IT firms deliver agile and scalable solutions globally to meet manufacturers’ needs
The manufacturing industry is undergoing a seismic shift, driven by the convergence of digital technologies, sustainability imperatives and evolving customer expectations. As manufacturers strive to modernize legacy systems, integrate emerging technologies and build resilient supply chains, they face a complex landscape of challenges and opportunities. This transformation is not uniform across geographies or company sizes. Mid-tier and specialist IT firms must navigate a complex landscape to deliver scalable, costefficient and domain-specific solutions.
Meet our team
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. Why are benchmarks important?
Benchmarks ground strategy in reality by showing how you compare to peers on cost and performance. Used well, benchmarks reveal outliers to investigate and areas for improvement without pushing you to chase the lowest price or sacrifice quality.
Q2. How can benchmarks accelerate savings opportunities?
Benchmarks reveal market-competitive rates and terms, letting you renegotiate with current providers instead of running a full RFP. That shortens time-to-value and reduces disruption while giving you the confidence that you’re paying a fair, defensible price.
Q3. What’s the advantage of a total cost of ownership (TCO) benchmark over a price benchmark?
A TCO benchmark looks at the whole solution, design, volumes, service levels, operating model and efficiency levers, so you spot bigger, more sustainable savings. Price-only benchmarks compare line items and can miss structural changes that lower overall cost.
Q4. Are benchmarks the same for different products and services?
No, benchmarks work best for fungible offerings with multiple suppliers. For proprietary products (e.g., software), pricing is shaped by bundles and SKU choices, so optimizing the bill of materials and total cost of ownership matters as much as discount level.
Contact the ISG Benchmarking Team
